Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs Xbox One S GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameDurango 2Condor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed914 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data
Texture fill rate43.870.25
Floating-point processing power1.404 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs482

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)6.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGLN/ANone
OpenCL1.2None
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 1 January 2001
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 180 nm

Xbox One S GPU has an age advantage of 15 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One S GPU and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One S GPU is a notebook card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One S GPU
Xbox One S GPU
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 175 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.