Riva 128 vs Xbox One GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)no data
GPU code nameDurangoNV3
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date22 November 2013 (11 years ago)1 April 1997 (27 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed853 MHz100 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm350 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate40.940.1
Floating-point processing power1.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs161
TMUs481

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPAGP 2x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz100 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s1.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA, 1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)5.0
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGLN/A1.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 1 April 1997
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 350 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 4 Watt

Xbox One GPU has an age advantage of 16 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Riva 128, on the other hand, has 2275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One GPU and Riva 128. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One GPU is a notebook card while Riva 128 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Xbox One GPU
Xbox One GPU
NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 86 votes

Rate Xbox One GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 40 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.