RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs ATI Xbox 360 S GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated16
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.83
Power efficiencyno data16.74
ArchitectureTeraScale (2005−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameXenos VejleAD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date19 June 2010 (14 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24018176
Core clock speed500 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors372 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology45 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)133 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0001,423
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs16568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Length260 mm267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 June 2010 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 45 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 133 Watt 300 Watt

ATI Xbox 360 S GPU has 125.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox 360 S GPU and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox 360 S GPU is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Xbox 360 S GPU
Xbox 360 S GPU
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 8 votes

Rate Xbox 360 S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.