RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile vs Xavier

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated158
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data54.81
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGV10BAD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed854 MHz1635 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHz2115 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rateno data203.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.99 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data96
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data8 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

Xavier has 233% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xavier and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xavier is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xavier on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 227 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xavier or RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.