Radeon Pro V320 vs XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameXG40Vega 10
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 September 2003 (22 years ago)29 June 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed350 MHz852 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors110 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data230 Watt
Texture fill rate2.800 ×2336.0
Floating-point processing powerno data10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4 ×264
TMUs8 ×2224
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x Molex2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×28 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×22048 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz945 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s ×2483.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.54.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 29 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 14 nm

Pro V320 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra and Radeon Pro V320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V320 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about XGI Volari Duo V8 Ultra or Radeon Pro V320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.