Tesla C1060 vs XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameXG41GT200B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date15 September 2003 (22 years ago)9 April 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data240
Core clock speed350 MHz610 MHz
Number of transistors90 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data188 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400 ×248.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×232
TMUs4 ×280
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2512 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s ×2102.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 9 April 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm

Tesla C1060 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 136.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra and Tesla C1060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Tesla C1060 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra
Volari Duo V5 Ultra
NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Tesla C1060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra or Tesla C1060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.