Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureXG4 (2003−2005)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameXG41Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 September 2003 (22 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors90 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate1.400 ×272.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×224
TMUs4 ×248
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 September 2003 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 130 nm 10 nm

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics 96EU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra
Volari Duo V5 Ultra
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 274 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about XGI Volari Duo V5 Ultra or Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.