Radeon 760M vs ATI WinCharger

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated426
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Power efficiencyno data66.27
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameMach64Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 1995 (30 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed40 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2599 MHz
Number of transistors1 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data83.17
Floating-point processing powerno data5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs116
TMUsno data32
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L0 Cacheno data128 KB
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed40 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1995 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 600 nm 4 nm

Radeon 760M has an age advantage of 28 years, and a 14900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between WinCharger and Radeon 760M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate WinCharger on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 507 votes

Rate Radeon 760M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about WinCharger or Radeon 760M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.