ATI WinCharger vs ATI Video Xpression+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Mach (1992−1997)
GPU code nameMach64Mach64
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 1996 (29 years ago)1 November 1995 (30 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$229

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed62 MHz40 MHz
Number of transistors1 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm600 nm
ROPs11

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCI
Width1-slot1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOEDO
Maximum RAM amount2 MB2 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz40 MHz
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s320.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 1 November 1995

ATI Video Xpression+ has an age advantage of 6 months.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and WinCharger. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate WinCharger on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Video Xpression+ or WinCharger, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.