GeForce2 MX vs ATI Video Xpression+

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1597
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMach64NV11 A2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 1996 (29 years ago)28 June 2000 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed62 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors1 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.7
ROPs12
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSDR
Maximum RAM amount2 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A7.0
OpenGLN/A1.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 28 June 2000
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 600 nm 180 nm

GeForce2 MX has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and GeForce2 MX. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+
NVIDIA GeForce2 MX
GeForce2 MX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 27 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Video Xpression+ or GeForce2 MX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.