FireGL V8600 vs Video Xpression+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMach64R600
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 May 1996 (28 years ago)14 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899
Current price$118 $200 (0.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed62 MHz688 MHz
Number of transistors1 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology600 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data159 Watt
Texture fill rateno data11.01
Floating-point performanceno data440.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed62 MHz1736 MHz
Memory bandwidth496.0 MB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A10.0 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 1996 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 600 nm 80 nm

We couldn't decide between Video Xpression+ and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Video Xpression+ is a desktop card while FireGL V8600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Video Xpression+
Video Xpression+
ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Video Xpression on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.