Radeon Graphics 512SP vs Vanta LT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV5 B5Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 2000 (25 years ago)7 March 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed105 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2100 MHz
Number of transistors15 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2167.20
Floating-point processing powerno data2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed100 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth800.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.7 (6.4)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2000 7 March 2020
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 20 years, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Vanta LT and Radeon Graphics 512SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Vanta LT
Vanta LT
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 43 votes

Rate Vanta LT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 93 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Vanta LT or Radeon Graphics 512SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.