Radeon Vega 7 vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 600 605 610 620 730 (Rocket Lake) G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe G4 48EUs
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 320SP Graphics 384SP Mobile Graphics 448SP Mobile Graphics 512SP Mobile Vega 7

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics and Radeon Vega 7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

UHD Graphics
2021
10 Watt
5.11

Vega 7 outperforms UHD Graphics by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
Vega 7 Vega 7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking647583
Place by popularity315
Power efficiency38.7311.25
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Cezanne
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)13 April 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256448
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate12.0053.20
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1628

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16−18
−43.8%
23
+43.8%
1440p21−24
−33.3%
28
+33.3%
4K12−14
−50%
18
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 63
+0%
63
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 17
+0%
17
+0%
Metro Exodus 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 23
+0%
23
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%
Valorant 73
+0%
73
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
+0%
21
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Sons of the Forest 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14
+0%
14
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Sons of the Forest 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 25
+0%
25
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Sons of the Forest 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how UHD Graphics and Vega 7 compete in popular games:

  • Vega 7 is 44% faster in 1080p
  • Vega 7 is 33% faster in 1440p
  • Vega 7 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.11 6.68
Recency 11 January 2021 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics has 350% lower power consumption.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has a 30.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX 640 Radeon RX 640
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GeForce MX350 GeForce MX350
UHD Graphics UHD Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
T1000 T1000
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
T400 T400
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
T600 T600
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
CMP 70HX CMP 70HX
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
T400 4 GB NVIDIA 4 GB
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
RTX 2050 Mobile NVIDIA RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
vs
UHD Graphics Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 8446 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2933 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Radeon Vega 7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.