Radeon RX 5900 vs UHD Graphics

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking651not rated
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Power efficiency39.08no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564096
Core clock speed350 MHzno data
Boost clock speed750 MHz1635 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00418.6
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS13.39 TFLOPS
ROPs896
TMUs16256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared14000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics has 2900% lower power consumption.

RX 5900, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics and Radeon RX 5900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5900 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
AMD Radeon RX 5900
Radeon RX 5900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8714 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Radeon RX 5900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.