Matrox Marvel G400-TV vs UHD Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking655not rated
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Power efficiency39.13no data
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameJasper Lake GT1Toucan
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 January 2021 (4 years ago)20 May 1999 (26 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256no data
Core clock speed350 MHz125 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data10 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm+250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Wattno data
Texture fill rate12.000.25
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs82
TMUs162

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCI
Lengthno data150 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6None
OpenCL3.0None
Vulkan1.2N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 20 May 1999
Chip lithography 10 nm 250 nm

UHD Graphics has an age advantage of 21 years, and a 2400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics and Matrox Marvel G400-TV. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Marvel G400-TV is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics
Matrox Marvel G400-TV
Marvel G400-TV

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 8959 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Matrox Marvel G400-TV on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics or Matrox Marvel G400-TV, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.