GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 vs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking709not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency11.64no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeG98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores488
Core clock speed350 MHz529 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2.116
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data256 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data702 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data11.23 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 3 June 2008
Chip lithography 10 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 13 Watt

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.

9200M GS GDDR3, on the other hand, has 115.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 539 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs or GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.