Tesla M2090 vs UHD Graphics Xe G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.70
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48512
Core clock speedno data651 MHz
Number of transistorsno data3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data41.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G1 has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe G1 and Tesla M2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G1 is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 30 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G1 or Tesla M2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.