GeForce Go 6200 vs UHD Graphics Xe G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1547
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.19
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNV44 A2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)1 February 2006 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores487
Core clock speedno data300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistorsno data75 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data16 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.200
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4DDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data4.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_19.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGLno data2.1
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 10 nm 110 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G1 has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe G1 and GeForce Go 6200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G1
UHD Graphics Xe G1
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6200
GeForce Go 6200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G1 or GeForce Go 6200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.