GRID M3-3020 vs UHD Graphics Xe G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeGM107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 August 2020 (5 years ago)18 May 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48640
Core clock speedno data1033 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1306 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Texture fill rateno data52.24
Floating-point processing powerno data1.672 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data40
L1 Cacheno data320 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1300 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data83.2 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_112 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2020 18 May 2016
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G1 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics Xe G1 and GRID M3-3020. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe G1 is a notebook graphics card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe G1
UHD Graphics Xe G1
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 5 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe G1 or GRID M3-3020, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.