Radeon 610M vs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs

Place in the ranking	678	789
Place by popularity	not in top-100	50
Power efficiency	no data	13.29
Architecture	Gen. 12 (2021−2023)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	Tiger Lake Xe	Dragon Range
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 March 2021 (3 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	128
Core clock speed	350 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	2200 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	no data	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	17.60
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.5632 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	4
TMUs	no data	8
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	no data	System Shared
Memory bus width	no data	System Shared
Memory clock speed	no data	System Shared
Shared memory	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	DirectX 12_1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 4.32
+49.5%

Radeon 610M 2.89

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 3322
+16%

Radeon 610M 2863

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 2493
+26.8%

Radeon 610M 1965

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs 12523

Radeon 610M 13898
+11%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	16 +23.1%	13 −23.1%
1440p	90−95 +47.5%	61 −47.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	18 +157%	7−8 −157%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Far Cry 5	14 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%
Fortnite	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	19 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +54.2%	24−27 −54.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 +30%	10−11 −30%
Valorant	8−9	0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16 +129%	7−8 −129%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Dota 2	34 +240%	10 −240%
Far Cry 5	13 −61.5%	21 +61.5%
Fortnite	24−27 +56.3%	16−18 −56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +35.7%	14 −35.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	13 −23.1%	16 +23.1%
Metro Exodus	6 −83.3%	11 +83.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Valorant	8−9	0−1
World of Tanks	70−75 +38.5%	50−55 −38.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	15 +114%	7−8 −114%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +50%	6−7 −50%
Dota 2	31 +288%	8−9 −288%
Far Cry 5	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +72.7%	11 −72.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +37%	27−30 −37%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +55.6%	9−10 −55.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite

24−27
+56.3%

16−18

−56.3%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Valorant	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +28.6%	7−8 −28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite

9−10
+50%

6−7

−50%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +6.7%	14−16 −6.7%
Valorant	4−5 +100%	2−3 −100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	5−6 +66.7%	3−4 −66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +100%	1−2 −100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 +50%	8−9 −50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite

3−4
+50%

2−3

−50%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	16 +0%	16 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Elden Ring	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	0−1	0−1

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	0−1
Elden Ring	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
World of Tanks	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Valorant	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Elden Ring	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Valorant	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 23% faster in 1080p
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 48% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs is 400% faster.
in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 610M is 150% faster.

All in all, in popular games: