Radeon RX 5600 OEM vs UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) with Radeon RX 5600 OEM, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
2021
4.34

5600 OEM outperforms Graphics 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) by a whopping 580% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking713218
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiencyno data15.11
ArchitectureGen. 12 (2021−2023)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeNavi 10
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 May 2021 (4 years ago)21 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed350 MHz1130 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data199.7
Floating-point processing powerno data6.39 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
L2 Cacheno data3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data6 GB
Memory bus widthno data192 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−547%
110−120
+547%
1440p30
−567%
200−210
+567%
4K12
−567%
80−85
+567%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 53
−560%
350−400
+560%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−550%
65−70
+550%
Hogwarts Legacy 12
−567%
80−85
+567%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 18
−567%
120−130
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−576%
230−240
+576%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Far Cry 5 14
−579%
95−100
+579%
Fortnite 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Valorant 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Counter-Strike 2 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
−549%
500−550
+549%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 36
−567%
240−250
+567%
Far Cry 5 13
−554%
85−90
+554%
Fortnite 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−567%
80−85
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 11
−536%
70−75
+536%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−525%
100−105
+525%
Valorant 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 15
−567%
100−105
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Dota 2 33
−567%
220−230
+567%
Far Cry 5 12
−567%
80−85
+567%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−567%
140−150
+567%
Hogwarts Legacy 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8
−525%
50−55
+525%
Valorant 55−60
−514%
350−400
+514%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
−554%
170−180
+554%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−567%
220−230
+567%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
−576%
230−240
+576%
Valorant 45−50
−538%
300−310
+538%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−550%
65−70
+550%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−525%
50−55
+525%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Valorant 21−24
−536%
140−150
+536%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Dota 2 12
−567%
80−85
+567%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

This is how UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) and RX 5600 OEM compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 OEM is 547% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 OEM is 567% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5600 OEM is 567% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.34 29.52
Recency 11 May 2021 21 January 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) has an age advantage of 1 year.

RX 5600 OEM, on the other hand, has a 580.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5600 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 5600 OEM is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
Radeon RX 5600 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 30 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 103 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) or Radeon RX 5600 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.