Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs UHD Graphics P750

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking647not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.14no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Alder Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256768
Core clock speed350 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate83.2067.20
Floating-point processing power0.6656 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs6448

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusRing Bus
WidthIGPIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsMotherboard DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

UHD Graphics P750 has 200% lower power consumption.

Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, on the other hand, has a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics P750 and Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96EU
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 180 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics 96EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.