Tesla PG503-216 vs UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking884not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.85no data
ArchitectureGen. 11 (2021)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGen. 11GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 January 2021 (3 years ago)26 November 2019 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325120
Core clock speed350 MHz1312 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1530 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4.8 - 10 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.67 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data32 GB
Memory bus widthno data4096 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1106 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,133 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2021 26 November 2019
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 250 Watt

UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 6150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) and Tesla PG503-216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) is a notebook card while Tesla PG503-216 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
NVIDIA Tesla PG503-216
Tesla PG503-216

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 17 votes

Rate UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Tesla PG503-216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.