Radeon Instinct MI250X vs UHD Graphics G7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2Aldebaran
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)8 November 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51214080
Core clock speed200 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz1700 MHz
Number of transistorsno data58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate16.001,496
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs8no data
TMUs32880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1600 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.4N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 8 November 2021
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 500 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 has 3233.3% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G7 and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7
UHD Graphics G7
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 124 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.