RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics G7

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated17
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data6.82
Power efficiencyno data16.62
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (4 years ago)3 December 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51218176
Core clock speed200 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate16.001,423
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs8192
TMUs32568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data960.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 3 December 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 300 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 has 1900% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G7 and RTX 6000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7
UHD Graphics G7
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 77 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.