ATI FirePro V3800 vs UHD Graphics G7

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameLakefield GT2Redwood
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2020 (5 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512400
Core clock speed200 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data627 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt43 Watt
Texture fill rate16.0013.00
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS0.52 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs3220
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 28 May 2020 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 10 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 43 Watt

UHD Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 186.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G7 and FirePro V3800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V3800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G7
UHD Graphics G7
ATI FirePro V3800
FirePro V3800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 4 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 51 votes

Rate FirePro V3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G7 or FirePro V3800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.