RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs UHD Graphics G1

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.75
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT1AD104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 May 2019 (6 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2567424
Core clock speed300 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistorsno data35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40386.3
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs16232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.971.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2019 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 110 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 has 633.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G1 and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1
UHD Graphics G1
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 207 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 31 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics G1 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.