Arc A380 vs UHD Graphics G1

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data43.95
Power efficiencyno data14.94
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT1DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 May 2019 (5 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2561024
Core clock speed300 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate14.40131.2
Floating-point processing power0.4608 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared96 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data186.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.971.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 May 2019 14 June 2022
Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 has 400% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics G1 and Arc A380. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics G1 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics G1
UHD Graphics G1
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 167 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 824 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.