Radeon PRO W6300 vs UHD Graphics 920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.44
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed400 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rateno data97.92
Floating-point processing powerno data3.133 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data32 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data64 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

UHD Graphics 920 has 66.7% lower power consumption.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 920 and Radeon PRO W6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 920 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W6300 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 82 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 920 or Radeon PRO W6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.