Data Center GPU Max NEXT vs UHD Graphics 920

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2Rialto Bridge
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data20480
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rateno data2,048
TMUsno data1280

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountno data128 GB
Memory bus widthno data8192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared3.1 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data3,205 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 800 Watt

UHD Graphics 920 has 5233.3% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max NEXT, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 920 and Data Center GPU Max NEXT. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 920
UHD Graphics 920
Intel Data Center GPU Max NEXT
Data Center GPU Max NEXT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 87 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 63 votes

Rate Data Center GPU Max NEXT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 920 or Data Center GPU Max NEXT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.