GeForce 8400 SE vs UHD Graphics 910

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.24
ArchitectureGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameIce Lake GT2G86S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data1 August 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speed400 MHz459 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data210 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate16.003.672
Floating-point processing power0.512 TFLOPS0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 10 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

UHD Graphics 910 has a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 910 and GeForce 8400 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 910
UHD Graphics 910
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 SE
GeForce 8400 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 910 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 8 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 910 or GeForce 8400 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.