ATI Radeon 7000 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4311587
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency63.83no data
Architectureno dataRage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1RV100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)19 February 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data183 MHz
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data0.55
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data3

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data32 MB
Memory bus widthno data64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data183 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data2.928 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Far Cry 5 9 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Counter-Strike 2 70−75 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 27 no data
Far Cry 5 8 no data
Fortnite 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 5 35−40 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 6 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 7 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 no data
Dota 2 25 no data
Far Cry 5 8 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 20−22 no data
Metro Exodus 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 30−35 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
Metro Exodus 9−10 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18 no data
Valorant 65−70 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 18−20 no data
Counter-Strike 2 8−9 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 no data
Dota 2 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 12−14 no data
Forza Horizon 4 21−24 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 19 February 2001
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 20 years, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and Radeon 7000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 7000 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
ATI Radeon 7000
Radeon 7000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 132 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 198 votes

Rate Radeon 7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or Radeon 7000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.