GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking432not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency63.84no data
Architectureno dataTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1GT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (4 years ago)23 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speedno data576 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rateno data36.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPsno data28
TMUsno data64
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data896 MB
Memory bus widthno data448 Bit
Memory clock speedno data999 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data111.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 23 July 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 182 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 12 years, a 292.9% more advanced lithography process, and 1113.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 133 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.