GMA X4500M vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking372not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.10no data
Architectureno dataGeneration 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Eaglelake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 March 2021 (3 years ago)1 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data80
Core clock speedno data400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rateno data4.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.064 TFLOPS
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data10

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data10.0
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500M, on the other hand, has 15.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and GMA X4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook card while GMA X4500M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Intel GMA X4500M
GMA X4500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 110 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 10 votes

Rate GMA X4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.