FirePro M8900 vs UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking436not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency64.32no data
Architectureno dataTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameRocket Lake GT1Blackcomb
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date30 March 2021 (5 years ago)12 April 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data960
Core clock speedno data680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rateno data32.64
Floating-point processing powerno data1.306 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data48
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno datan/a
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data900 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data115 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data11.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2021 12 April 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 75 Watt

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) has an age advantage of 9 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 136 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.