Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile vs UHD Graphics 710

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking852not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.49no data
ArchitectureGeneration 12.2 (2022−2023)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameAlder Lake GT1Renoir
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date4 January 2022 (3 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128384
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.4036.00
Floating-point processing power0.3328 TFLOPS1.152 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 January 2022 6 January 2020
Chip lithography 10 nm 7 nm

UHD Graphics 710 has an age advantage of 1 year.

Graphics 384SP Mobile, on the other hand, has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 710 and Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 710 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 710
UHD Graphics 710
AMD Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile
Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 140 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 7 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 710 or Radeon Graphics 384SP Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.