Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking810not rated
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Power efficiency14.48no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)23 November 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1841024
Core clock speed350 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistors189 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate26.4562.40
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS1.997 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2364
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1365 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data174.7 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 23 November 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4457 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.