ATI Radeon 7200 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7741544
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency14.17no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2R100
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2000 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores184no data
Core clock speed350 MHz166 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate26.451
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32
TMUs236

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1AGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared166 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data5.312 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x VGA

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
+59500%
ATI 7200 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18no data
1440p10no data
4K7no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 8 no data
Counter-Strike 2 27 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 5 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8 no data
Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 19 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Far Cry 5 6 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8 no data
Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Counter-Strike 2 4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 29 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 21 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Fortnite 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
Forza Horizon 5 5−6 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 7 no data
Metro Exodus 3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 no data
Dota 2 19 no data
Far Cry 5 6−7 no data
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10 no data
Valorant 45−50 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16 no data

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3 no data
Metro Exodus 1−2 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data
Valorant 27−30 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 no data
Far Cry 5 5−6 no data
Forza Horizon 4 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6 no data

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Valorant 14−16 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 no data
Dota 2 7 no data
Far Cry 5 3−4 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 1 April 2000
Chip lithography 14 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 23 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 53.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Radeon 7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
ATI Radeon 7200
Radeon 7200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4142 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 21 vote

Rate Radeon 7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Radeon 7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.