RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared UHD Graphics 630 with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

UHD Graphics 630
2017
15 Watt
3.09

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 1397% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking76273
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data82.29
Power efficiency14.1245.32
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2AD107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1842816
Core clock speed350 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors189 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45187.4
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs348
TMUs2388
Tensor Coresno data88
Ray Tracing Coresno data22

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
CUDA-8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

UHD Graphics 630 3.09
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 46.27
+1397%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

UHD Graphics 630 1192
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 17834
+1396%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
1440p10
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
4K7
−1329%
100−110
+1329%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.82
1440pno data4.64
4Kno data6.49

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5
−1300%
70−75
+1300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Battlefield 5 10
−1300%
140−150
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 7
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Far Cry New Dawn 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−1233%
400−450
+1233%
Hitman 3 6
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Metro Exodus 13
−1362%
190−200
+1362%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
−1338%
230−240
+1338%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30
−1233%
400−450
+1233%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Forza Horizon 4 27
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
−1317%
170−180
+1317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−1367%
220−230
+1367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 28
−1329%
400−450
+1329%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−1344%
130−140
+1344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−1329%
100−105
+1329%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−1371%
250−260
+1371%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1204%
300−310
+1204%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−1355%
160−170
+1355%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−1329%
200−210
+1329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−1310%
550−600
+1310%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1300%
70−75
+1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%
Hitman 3 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−1374%
280−290
+1374%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1317%
85−90
+1317%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−1300%
14−16
+1300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−1275%
55−60
+1275%

This is how UHD Graphics 630 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1338% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 1329% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.09 46.27
Recency 1 October 2017 12 February 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 70 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 366.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 1397.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3898 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 27 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.