Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking811not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency14.42no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1842048 ×2
Core clock speed350 MHz1164 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz1506 MHz
Number of transistors189 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45192.8 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS6.169 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs364 ×2
TMUs23128 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1MXM-B (3.0)
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data192.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
CUDA-6.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 11 January 2017
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has an age advantage of 8 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1233.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile
Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4426 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or Quadro P5000 X2 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.