GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 vs UHD Graphics 630

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking762not rated
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Power efficiency14.17no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2AD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (7 years ago)10 June 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1848448
Core clock speed350 MHz2340 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz2610 MHz
Number of transistors189 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate26.45689.0
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPS44.1 TFLOPS
ROPs396
TMUs23264
Tensor Coresno data264
Ray Tracing Coresno data66

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data310 mm
WidthIGP3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.3 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1031.3
CUDA-8.9

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2017 10 June 2024
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 285 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has 1800% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3922 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 48 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.