ATI FireMV 2250 vs UHD Graphics 630

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking832not rated
Place by popularity43not in top-100
Power efficiency14.63no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameComet Lake GT2RV516
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 October 2017 (8 years ago)2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores184no data
Core clock speed350 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate26.452.400
Floating-point processing power0.4232 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs234

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x S-Video, 1x DMS-59

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.1N/A
Vulkan1.1.103N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 32 Watt

UHD Graphics 630 has a 543% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 630 and FireMV 2250. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 4734 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireMV 2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 630 or FireMV 2250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.