ATI Radeon Xpress X1200 vs UHD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking875not rated
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Power efficiency12.60no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)no data
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2RS690M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2017 (8 years ago)1 February 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1000 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors189 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate24.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs3no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing Busno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR3/DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GB128 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2017 1 February 2007
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 80 nm

UHD Graphics 620 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 620 and Radeon Xpress X1200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 620
UHD Graphics 620
ATI Radeon Xpress X1200
Radeon Xpress X1200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5164 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 71 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress X1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 620 or Radeon Xpress X1200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.