Intel UHD Graphics 620 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX110
Comparison of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110 architecture, market type and release date.
UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
23.83 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x1
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
LPDDR3 / DDR4
GDDR5 / DDR3
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
64 / 128 Bit
Memory clock speed
40.1 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
APIs supported by UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
UHD Graphics 620 5.35
MX110 7.51 +40.4%
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
UHD Graphics 620 87698
MX110 126027 +43.7%
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
UHD Graphics 620 9214
MX110 11086 +20.3%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
UHD Graphics 620 1022
MX110 1644 +60.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
UHD Graphics 620 1118
MX110 1718 +53.7%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
UHD Graphics 620 1709
MX110 2131 +24.7%
3DMark Vantage Performance
UHD Graphics 620 7761
MX110 9124 +17.6%
UHD Graphics 620 1030
MX110 1604 +55.7%
Let's see how good UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 620
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 28 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 30 watts)
QuickSync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce MX110
40.4% faster in synthetic tests
Somewhat newer (17 November 2017 vs 1 September 2017)
More pipelines (256 vs 24)
Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)
PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)
CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
So, UHD Graphics 620 or MX110?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce MX110.
Should you still have questions on choice between UHD Graphics 620 and GeForce MX110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.