Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition vs UHD Graphics 617

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking857not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9 Amber Lake (2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameKaby-Lake GT2Pitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date30 October 2018 (5 years ago)23 November 2014 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores241024
Core clock speed300 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1150 MHz975 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate25.2062.40
Floating-point performance0.4032 gflops1.997 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data5.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data174.7 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1031.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 October 2018 23 November 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 80 Watt

UHD Graphics 617 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 433.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 617 and Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 617 is a notebook card while Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 617
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 77 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 617 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.