Quadro 4100 vs UHD Graphics 615

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking967not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.39no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameAmber Lake GT2GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 November 2018 (7 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921344
Core clock speed300 MHz797 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate21.6089.26
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPSno data
ROPs332
TMUs24112

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data160 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1782 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data57.02 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2.175
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 615 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 615 and Quadro 4100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 615 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro 4100 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics 615
NVIDIA Quadro 4100
Quadro 4100

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 59 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 615 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5 votes

Rate Quadro 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 615 or Quadro 4100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.