Radeon Graphics 512SP vs UHD Graphics 610

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking908not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.78no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameCoffee Lake GT1Renoir
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 April 2018 (6 years ago)7 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96512
Core clock speed300 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed900 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistors189 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm+++7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8067.20
Floating-point processing power0.1728 TFLOPS2.15 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs1232

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusIGP
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7 (6.4)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 April 2018 7 March 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

Graphics 512SP has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 610 and Radeon Graphics 512SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook card while Radeon Graphics 512SP is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610
AMD Radeon Graphics 512SP
Radeon Graphics 512SP

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 637 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 77 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 512SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.