Radeon R5 A220 vs UHD Graphics 605

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1073not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.27no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1.5Caicos
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores144160
Core clock speed200 MHz775 MHz
Boost clock speed750 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million370 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate13.506.200
Floating-point processing power0.216 TFLOPSno data
ROPs34
TMUs188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1800 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data14.4 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 35 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 605 and Radeon R5 A220. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook card while Radeon R5 A220 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605
AMD Radeon R5 A220
Radeon R5 A220

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 831 vote

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 16 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.