ATI FirePro V7800 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1194not rated
Place by popularity91not in top-100
Power efficiency12.28no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Cypress
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date11 December 2017 (7 years ago)26 April 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$759

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961440
Core clock speed200 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHzno data
Number of transistors189 million2,154 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate7.80050.40
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPS2.016 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs1272
L1 Cacheno data144 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data128.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan+N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 December 2017 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 150 Watt

UHD Graphics 600 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and FirePro V7800. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro V7800 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600
ATI FirePro V7800
FirePro V7800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4048 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate FirePro V7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or FirePro V7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.