FirePro M3100 vs UHD Graphics 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1205not rated
Place by popularity77not in top-100
Power efficiency12.32no data
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGemini Lake GT1Mars
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 December 2017 (8 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96384
Core clock speed200 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed650 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors189 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)5 Wattno data
Texture fill rate7.80016.80
Floating-point processing power0.1248 TFLOPSno data
ROPs28
TMUs1224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data32 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.46.5 (5.1)
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1 (1.2)
Vulkan+1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

UHD Graphics 600 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between UHD Graphics 600 and FirePro M3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that UHD Graphics 600 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M3100 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 4166 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FirePro M3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about UHD Graphics 600 or FirePro M3100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.